Minimum provider selection
Ask users to select at least three providers before proceeding, setting a clear expectation and increasing the chances of finding an available cleaner.
Reducing booking drop-offs in the Helpling household services app.
Booking flow · Mobile experience · Conversion-focused design
4 weeks · Concept exploration
This project explored a recurring challenge in Helpling's mobile app: users leaving the booking flow before confirming a household cleaning service. I analyzed the journey, identified points of friction, and developed three UX concepts to make the experience clearer and help users move forward with confidence.
The four-week project took place in 2022. The proposed solutions were designed within Helpling's existing interface and visual system, with a focus on improving the user journey rather than redesigning the entire product. The work offered practical directions for reducing friction and supporting booking conversion.
Reviewed the booking journey and identified where users dropped off.
Explored approaches to reduce friction and support completion.
Developed three booking-flow concepts within the existing app UI.
Tested concepts, gathered feedback, and improved clarity.
Helpling connects customers with professional household cleaners. Yet users were leaving the app before completing a booking, creating friction for customers and missed opportunities for the business.
Behavioral analytics and internal feedback pointed to moments of uncertainty in the booking journey. Many customers were first-time users or busy people seeking a reliable service quickly. Unclear choices, hesitation about providers, and limited guidance could interrupt that decision.
The goal was to understand where users struggled and design targeted improvements that made booking more intuitive and reassuring.
Figures provided in the project brief; measurement definitions and sample sizes are not specified.
Mapping the existing journey helped locate the specific step where users encountered difficulty.
The solutions needed to work within an established product, a short timeline, and the needs of different user groups.
The existing platform limited how much of the booking flow could change. Improvements had to fit its structure without disrupting established functionality.
With approximately four weeks available, the work prioritized high-impact opportunities and fast iterations over a complete overhaul.
Limited access to detailed user-behavior data made it difficult to understand every pain point. Available analytics informed assumptions, while qualitative feedback helped validate ideas where possible.
Users had different levels of technical confidence and familiarity with digital services. The flow needed to balance simplicity and functionality without excluding any group.
The existing app technology constrained which interactions could be implemented realistically. Some ideas needed to be adapted or removed to remain technically feasible.
Solutions needed to work across devices and operating systems. Differences in screen size, performance, and interaction patterns had to be considered.
The design concepts focused on three expected behaviors: encouraging enough provider selections, helping users compare their options, and offering feedback about their likelihood of finding a match.
Encourage users to choose at least three providers before continuing, improving their chances of a successful match.
Use filtering and sorting to help customers compare providers and make more confident selections.
Show a probability indicator so users can refine their choices before submitting a booking.
The share of users who successfully finish the booking journey.
Where users leave the flow, and whether those points of friction improve.
How efficiently users move from selecting providers to confirming their request.
Survey feedback about clarity, ease of use, and confidence in the process.
The analysis pointed to three recurring UX themes that shaped the proposed solutions.
Too many options can create decision fatigue. Simplifying selection helps users keep moving.
Uncertainty about provider availability can lead to hesitation. Clearer expectations help build trust.
Without timely guidance, users may not know what to do next. Visible status and warnings make the process easier to understand.
Each concept addresses a different point of uncertainty in the provider-selection stage, while staying close to the existing app experience.
Ask users to select at least three providers before proceeding, setting a clear expectation and increasing the chances of finding an available cleaner.
Help users narrow down and organize preferred providers, making selection more intuitive and relevant to their needs.
Introduce a visual indicator of the likelihood of finding a match, prompting users to adjust their choices when too few providers are selected.
The work is described as conceptual. The reported percentages in the source material have not been independently verified, and the study details are not yet available.
The exploration showed how focused UX changes can address friction without requiring a complete product redesign.
Identifying drop-off points helped focus the design work, while gaps in the data highlighted the importance of testing assumptions.
Exploring multiple concepts created opportunities to compare approaches that could support both user confidence and booking conversion.
Respecting the existing UI, technical limitations, and diverse user needs kept the proposals practical and feasible.
Evaluating concepts against completion, drop-off, time, and satisfaction metrics helped define what meaningful improvement would look like.